We’re going to be talking quite a lot about the Copac reengineering, including the move to FRBRise Copac, and in order for you to have some idea of how this is going to change what we do, you need to know what we do now. So here’s a brief background on the life of a Copac record.
Records are sent to us by the contributing institutions, usually in MARC exchange format, which looks like this:
We then run this through programmes created by our wonderful programmers (and about which I know very very little, except that they’re fantastic and save both my eyes and my sanity), which create records that look like this:
This is much easier on the eye, which is fortunate, as this is the stage where I use the warning file (also generated by the program) to look through and track down any possible errors. This is mainly only done when loading a new library – once a library has been loaded, we just keep an eye on their updates to identify any changes, or new issues that arise.
For instance, the warning file might say ‘WARNING: LONG NAME IN 100 MAY NOT BE PERSONAL NAME REC 92765’. I would then look up that record, and check whether the long name in the 100 is, in fact, a personal name, or if it is a corporate name and needs to be in a 110.
This program has been evolving ever since the start of Copac, and it’s now able to handle most changes with very little need for human intervention. Therefore, when I see ‘WARNING: 700 ‘1 $aDaille, Jean, 1594-1670.’ CHANGED TO ‘1 $aDaille, Jean,$d1594-1670.’, I know that I don’t need to do anything – that change is correct.
Some warnings do need looking at in more depth. If I see a warning that says something along the lines of ‘WARNING: NO 245 IN REC 76932. 240 CONVERTED TO 245’, then I will look at the original record and the altered record to see if that change is correct.
At this stage we’ll also check if there are any generic fields being used in a local way, that notes are in the correct notes fields, and that all records have holdings information. Note that we’re largely not in a position to assess the quality of the data in the fields – purely that the right sort of data is in the right fields. We wouldn’t, for example, correct typos in author’s names or incorrect publication dates. As well as the fact that doing so would require making judgements, and make the whole process simply unmanageable, the data on Copac belongs to the contributing libraries, and so they are the ones who would need to make any corrections to the content. Thus, in general, the only changes we would make are to the MARC structure (or occasionally to the encoding of special characters), to try to ensure standardised data for record sharing and for building Copac. The data content of the fields we leave exactly as they are.
Once we’re satisfied that all this is correct, the data is loaded onto the RLUK shared cataloguing database in MARC21 format, where it is available for use by RLUK members and customers. Back in the Copac office, it’s time for another round of processing, before the data is loaded onto Copac. More on that next time!